slow boot times again
WinXPTalk.com Forum Index WinXPTalk.com
Forums for Windows XP users.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web winxptalk.com
slow boot times again

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WinXPTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System
Author Message
JustinH
Guest





Posted: Wed Oct 19, 2005 2:58 pm    Post subject: slow boot times again Reply with quote

Hi

This is less a plea for help than an observation which may be of
use/interest to other people - albeit I don't know why it happens or
what to do to prevent it!!

I have a windows XPe image built on an IBM Thinkpad T23, which boots
from a DVD, using a batch file as the custom shell, which then starts
my program.

The original build, using a generic 1x DVD- would boot in just over 4
minutes. When moved to second machine it would also boot in 4 minutes,
albeit with a 'new devices messsage box being thrown up.

If the same .iso image was recorded on a TDK or a generic 8X DVD+, it
would boot from the second machine in 45 seconds, but still took 4
minutes on the original machine.

We then purchased some additional T23s and tried further tests. We now
had two models of Panasonic DVD drive and one Toshiba, however the
Toshiba drive would not read the 8X DVD+ disks at all.

With two T23s, using the same DVD drive and the same 8X DVD+ disk one
boots in 45" the other in 4'. The slow machine has been upgraded to
the latest BIOS and embedded controllers, and the drive has also had
its firmware upgraded, but this makes no difference. I am loathe to
upgrade the fast machine in case it slows it down!

Both T23s have the same major and minor model numbers.

I don't know what is going on, but it does cast some interesting light
on the reports that some people have made of having excessive (4' plus)
boot times.

Justin
Back to top
Andy Allred [MS]
Guest





Posted: Thu Oct 27, 2005 7:05 am    Post subject: Re: slow boot times again Reply with quote

Hi Justin,
It's curious, but not unheard of if the BIOS is reporting different ven dev
IDs to PnP for those drive controllers. Once you get to the desktop of the
two machines using the XPe image, run TAP and check those PMQs to compare
the HW config detected by PnP.

Check to see if there's any differences reported for those two drives. If
so, then probably what's happening is that on the fast machine, PnP is
finding a more compatible driver. On the slower machine, PnP is defaulting
to a more generic driver.

This is just a guess <grin> Good luck.

-andy
--
Embedded team blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.



"JustinH" <justin.halls@brunel.ac.uk> wrote in message
news:1129715903.483344.169260@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
Hi

This is less a plea for help than an observation which may be of
use/interest to other people - albeit I don't know why it happens or
what to do to prevent it!!

I have a windows XPe image built on an IBM Thinkpad T23, which boots
from a DVD, using a batch file as the custom shell, which then starts
my program.

The original build, using a generic 1x DVD- would boot in just over 4
minutes. When moved to second machine it would also boot in 4 minutes,
albeit with a 'new devices messsage box being thrown up.

If the same .iso image was recorded on a TDK or a generic 8X DVD+, it
would boot from the second machine in 45 seconds, but still took 4
minutes on the original machine.

We then purchased some additional T23s and tried further tests. We now
had two models of Panasonic DVD drive and one Toshiba, however the
Toshiba drive would not read the 8X DVD+ disks at all.

With two T23s, using the same DVD drive and the same 8X DVD+ disk one
boots in 45" the other in 4'. The slow machine has been upgraded to
the latest BIOS and embedded controllers, and the drive has also had
its firmware upgraded, but this makes no difference. I am loathe to
upgrade the fast machine in case it slows it down!

Both T23s have the same major and minor model numbers.

I don't know what is going on, but it does cast some interesting light
on the reports that some people have made of having excessive (4' plus)
boot times.

Justin
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WinXPTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Office Forums Access Forums Windows Server Exchange Server Help
New Topics Powered by phpBB