EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservice
WinXPTalk.com Forum Index WinXPTalk.com
Forums for Windows XP users.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web winxptalk.com
EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservice
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WinXPTalk.com Forum Index -> Windows XP Media Center Edition
Author Message
Nigel Barker
Guest





Posted: Thu Nov 03, 2005 5:27 pm    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 08:04:03 -0800, "Martin Kirk"
<MartinKirk@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:



This is the Headend name
Quote:
Sky Digital BBC Scot/ITV Grampiam

This is the Headend ID
Quote:
ID: 210001
TV Signal: Set-top box
Schema Version: 5

I don't see anything in the Event Logs (any section) about Headends. I do
get the following:

Event Info: Failure attempting to download new Guide data. Please check your
Internet connection settings. If you are connecting through a firewall or
proxy, please verify that it has been properly configured.
Process: DefaultDomain
Object Name: Microsoft.Ehome.Epg.Ehepgdat

What makes this strange is thatI don't run out of guide data, so it clearly
isn't actually failing. If I start a manual downloa it goes painfully slowly
(a few % per hour), and the system crashes anyway before it finshes :).

It means that recent downloads have failed but you still have data from previous
successful downloads.

Scroll back through the Application Event Log & you should find some successful
downloads in the early hours of the morning. It's there you will find reference
to "headend" which obviously is a technical term understood by broadcasters, EPG
maintainers & Chris Hill.

--
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur
Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:28 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Thats 63 reports from the whole world.

Yes, the report does need to come from the MCE system itself.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Message-ID: <qemjm15q9m01kqhon63r10fj38igrdb49m@4ax.com
References: <pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com

<shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com>
<ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com>
<90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com>
<kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com>
<o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com>
<uCK2jz#3FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<0lfjm19qbbh6glqptbjkg93odm1n935r1q@4ax.com>
Quote:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 25
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 10:37:56 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 16.19.193.15
X-Complaints-To: abuse@HP.com
X-Trace: news.cpqcorp.net 1131014276 16.19.193.15 (Thu, 03 Nov 2005
02:37:56 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 02:37:56 PST
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company
Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli

ne.de!news.glorb.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.compaq.com!news.cp
qcorp.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Quote:
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:64559
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

On Thu, 03 Nov 2005 08:25:06 GMT, Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote:

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:34:51 GMT, a-chill@microsoft.com ("Chris Hill
[MSFT]")
wrote:

New reports: 63

Is that 63 new reports for the UK or for the whole world?

Another thought. Does the reporting tool depend on it being run on the MCE
machine with the problem? On reflection I'm guessing that it does so when
I have
entered EPG problems from my laptop this would explain why they disappear
into a
black hole. In fact I've just checked on the web page & see that:-

"When you submit a form, Windows error reporting gathers information
about the
current EPG configuration from your Media Center PC and sends this
information
with your completed issue submission form to Microsoft."

This might well explain why barely 6% of those 63 reports contain the
information required. Surely with this sort of failure rate you should be
looking at the information gathering tool that is clearly all but useless.

--
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur
Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:28 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi Dave,

The main reason is that until very recenty each country had a Program
Manager who requested changes. This past week we had a new person start
that is 100% dedicated to the EPG which is helping get these issues
resolved faster.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: David Lowndes <davidl@example.invalid
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:39:49 +0000
Message-ID: <m7mim1506blps94ee2mrcde8ha4p6hlui8@4ax.com
References: <78gsk15tngl98pn0as04mmmh3akvft66cc@4ax.com
pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl

<34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com>
<shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com>
<ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com>
<90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com>
<kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com>
<o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com>
<uCK2jz#3FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
Quote:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.0/32.763
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
NNTP-Posting-Host: i-195-137-121-142.freedom2surf.net 195.137.121.142
Lines: 1
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:64477
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

As for the new channels, that is something I'm working with the Program
Managers to get resolved. Its an uphill battle to get it changed

Chris,

Why is it an uphill battle to get something changed? Adding new and
removing old channels data must have been anticipated (they've not
been kept secret), so why isn't it happening automatically at the
right time? Whatever are the problems you're facing?

Dave
--
MVP VC++ FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
Back to top
CJSnet
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 1:28 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Chris this is a total cop-out and you know it. Sounds like you're quite
happy only having to do 6% of the work and ignoring 94% or errors because
there's 'not enough info', otherwise you'd make the web form foolproof, or
at least send an auto-e-mail telling people you need more info.

I find this disgusting, knowing how many errors I've sent, to realise even
though I gave all the info that would let you trace the fault, you may not
have even bothered with it and filed it in the trash because it wasn't the
specific info you desired.

How many users at home do you really expect to know what the hell a Headend
ID is?

It is simple, for example with a recent issue, here is all the info you
need:

ITV4 AND SKY HAVE LAUNCHED 2 NEW CHANNELS IN THE UK BUT THEY DON'T APPEAR ON
THE EPG FOR TELEWEST LONDON

If BDS really don't know what that means, then you all deserve for Media
Center to completely fail as a system, and at this rate it will.

WAKE UP FOR GOODNESS SAKE GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am e-mailing BDS direct with this error, as they have no problem speaking
English instead of headend flipping codes. They will fix the problem in a
timely fashion.

I suggest we all bypass Chris Hill and the online EPG report form, as it's
clearly totally pointless as they willingly ignore 94% of our good efforts.

Totally pathetic, sorry, you've really angered me now.
--
CJSnet

(Remove TEETH to reply by e-mail.)


""Chris Hill [MSFT]"" <a-chill@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uCK2jz%233FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Hi Nigel,

The issues that come through the website are reviewed and compared to
"known" issues, valid data and to see if there are enough details to
reproduce the issue. Very few of them contain this information. For
example here are the numbers from October 16th through October 22nd:

New reports: 63

Breakdown of bug numbers:

New bugs generated from reports: 4
Not an EPG issue: 3
Won't fix/By Design: 1
Duplicate reports: 1
Tech support request: 4
Not enough info, no cab/text file or no repro step reports: 50

In other words slightly more than 6% of the bug reports we received
actualy
contain the information I need to get them fixed. That is why I have
asked
a number of times that you include the following information in each issue
even though it should be generated by the bug report and then post it here
as a thread titled EPG: (Country).

Country:
TV Signal type:
Postal Code:
Headend Name:
Headend ID:
Detailed Description of the issue:

As for the new channels, that is something I'm working with the Program
Managers to get resolved. Its an uphill battle to get it changed but it
will happen mainly because of the feedback provided here in the newsgroup.

Chris Hill
Windows Media Data Quality
EPG/DVD/CD/Games/MSN

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
--------------------
From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting
Dataservices
Message-ID: <o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com
References: <ps6sk191gt6bkbkqrnpo5urhohku7u3dng@4ax.com
#VvVea9zFHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
78gsk15tngl98pn0as04mmmh3akvft66cc@4ax.com
pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com
shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com
ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com
90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com
kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 21
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:02:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 16.19.192.182
X-Complaints-To: abuse@HP.com
X-Trace: news.cpqcorp.net 1130785364 16.19.192.182 (Mon, 31 Oct 2005
11:02:44 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:02:44 PST
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company
Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli
ne.de!news.glorb.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.compaq.com!news.cp
qcorp.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:63935
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:26:43 GMT, Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote:

There are two more major launches of new TV channels in the UK next week
(Sky3 &
ITV4) on the Sky platform these are on channels 108 & 120 respectively.
Digiguide already has listings for Sky3 but as yet there is no sign of
these
channels in the MCE EPG.

Any bets on whether the More4 debacle will be repeated?

I am not surprised to see that Sky3 is now broadcasting & there is no
entry in
the MCE EPG. ITV4 starts tomorrow & again there is no entry in the EPG.
Digiguide has the data. It seems pretty likely that BDS would have the
data so
why doesn't Microsoft have this data ready to download to our EPGs?

I'll log a problem on the web site but I have no confidence that anybody
pays
any attention to these issues. Chris Hill of Microsoft seems to have
ducked for
cover & hasn't posted here for a while. I wonder why?

--
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur

Back to top
Robert Schlabbach
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:37 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

"CJSnet" <usenet@TEETHthe-simpson.tv> wrote in message
news:ubeGn7Y4FHA.4076@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
Quote:
I suggest we all bypass Chris Hill and the online EPG report form,

This is the completely wrong approach. Chris is the guy who - for the first
time since MCE was launched in Europe back in 2003!!! - is actually telling
us what's going on with the EPG and starting to move things. Our EPG error
submissions have _always_ been ignored, but for the first time someone
tells us what's happening.

If anything, we should back up Chris best we can in his endeavour to
improve the EPG service for us. If you "bypass" him, he won't have anything
to show to his superiors to convince them that change is badly needed.
Instead, *do* keep submitting your EPG errors via the online report form.
It's true, only numbers count at Microsoft - or at _any_ major corporation.
Think about it - which superior would respond to "Uh, we have 3 unhappy
customers in the newsgroup"? Compare this to "Hey, we have hundreds of
unresolved EPG service error reports from our customers, right here in our
database!" and you get the picture...

Regards,«
--
Robert Schlabbach
e-mail: robert_s@gmx.net
Berlin, Germany
Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 7:41 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi Tim,

These are all good questions and I've answered most of them in previous
posts (that may have been archived as it was over a year ago for some).
I'll try responding to each one you bring up.

Quote:
With so many faulty reports apparently being submitted, is there
nothing that can be done to improve front end validation and/or
automate the collation of technical data by the reporting tool without
user input? e.g. surely data like Head End ID and Post Code should be
obtainable automatically.

Yes but like all development processes it takes time and money. Right now
I have placed several solutions on the table for consideration and they are
being discussed. IF (Very big IF !), these happen it will not be any time
in the near future. If you have constructive suggestions please let me know
and I will bring those to the table. If they duplicate the ones I've come
up with (I'm not posting those hoping to get an honest response), it will
give me additional support for changes. The tool does gather that
information from a MCE system. If you really want to provide solid
information include a MCE System Diagnostic Report (Tool is on
microsoft.com as MCE Test Kit).

Quote:
If there really is nothing that can be done to improve data quality
then I wonder if any steps are taken to return the report to the
originator to seek clarification. It would be nice if one could see
the status of one's own report(s) to at least appreciate whether they
are being actioned or rejected etc..

There is a lot being done to improve data quality. As for returning the
report back to the originator, I cannot do that since that information is
not gathered/saved as part of the Microsoft Privacy Policy. As several can
attest, when I have that information (In many cases because I have seen
them here!), contact is made to clarify the issue. As for seeing the
status, that is one of the suggestions that I mentioned above. I would
love to see a system where you enter the issue and are able to check on the
status as we work towards resolution. It would also allow you to add more
comments if needed. Thats just one of many Wish list tools on the table.

Quote:
It appears from what you are saying that the end user experience of
this process is that 94% of all error reports disappear into a black
hole, never to emerge. Is it any wonder that people are disillusioned
with this process, especially when perfectly valid reports for the
most simple of problems is met with "it can't be fixed because of
legel difficulties".

I agree with you and I am probably even more frustrated about this than any
one of you. I see each of your issues here and most of the issues from the
error reporting tool and can't do anything about 94% of them as they are
duplicates or lack the information to fix or contact to get the information
I need. As for the "can't be fixed because of legel (sic) difficulties",
as I said in a previous post, I will not address it further mainly because
I don't know what they are other than there are legal reasons.

Quote:
Can you please explain why many of the Sky +1 channels have now been
added to the guide but still have no data? What is illegal about
adding an hour to the start and end times of each programme and
publishing that schedule?

I can explain why the Sky +1 channels were added. Its because several of
us have been hounding to get the information needed to have them added. As
for why the guide still doesn't have data, it falls into the above
statement about legal reasons. Remember, I'm not a Barister/Lawyer but a
support person who is attempting to get all of your issues resolved. In
some instance that meant ignoring processes and creating new ones. All of
these things take time but it is happening.

Quote:
Can you explain why incorrect channel numbers still exist in the
guide, despite having been reported weeks ago, and despite the
channels also being listed with their correct channel numbers?

Explain? I can and will but that doesn't mean it will do anything to
resolve the issues. When a bug is reported with the guide and it has all
the information needed to create a valid issue report that can be resolved,
it is Triaged by myself and several other people. We rank it based upon
the severity of problem. Using the example you provided having a duplicate
channel in the guide especially since on has the correct frequency is
ranked lower than a missing lineup. A missing lineup that affects 30
people will be ranked lower than one that is affecting 30 million people.

Let me tell you that this process is not fun. Just like any surgeon will
tell you, every issue that you don't get fixed now is heartbreaking but you
have to take the higher serious issues first and then when they are
resolved, work on the smaller ones. Do we include the age of the report?
Yes along with all the other factors that is one that we look at. There
are several issues that would be ranked lower than they are if they were
new but because of the age, they are moved higher on the list. The goal we
have is that once we have all the processes in place that we are working
on, most issue you submit are resolved within specific time. I will not
give that time as they have previously come back to haunt me.

Quote:
Something here still does not add up.

I hope that these responses will answer some of your questions. When the
EPG is incorrect I take it personally as I want & strive to have all the
data correct but it takes time.

I ask that you look back and remember that before now, how many people were
dedicated to working with you to resolve the issues? By my stepping in
here I knew that the brunt of your frustration would be redirected in my
direction. I can deal with that and in fact, I welcome it as in the end it
will benefit you and Media Center. Remember, I'm on your side in these
issues and have positioned myself to be your voice inside Microsoft about
these data quality issues. Changes take time but they do happen. The
largest things that you can do to help this is to give me quality data and
to not contact BDS directly. Every e-mail that they receive about the
guide is one less bug they can fix. They have to stop working on the bugs
and send me the e-mail with a series of questions as I fill in some
additional information they need but you don't supply.

Thanks!
Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: Tiny Tim <_tim_dodd@hotmail.com
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 22:02:21 +0000
Message-ID: <p9dim1lfp97an32sl6n72dgt49fi8bd5ic@4ax.com
References: <78gsk15tngl98pn0as04mmmh3akvft66cc@4ax.com
pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl

<34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com>
<shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com>
<ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com>
<90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com>
<kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com>
<o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com>
<uCK2jz#3FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
Quote:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 146
Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 1eb5c5f4.ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net
X-Trace:
DXC=RnnC1fgT6VbYhgY76a3i@kigd3Y`7Rb;n37XnI;[OUCdQ2[_WFf>@ne?[b41SXNlSaCBUkc[

PEkYgA_VQBEieO2k
Quote:
X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net
Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli

ne.de!fr.ip.ndsoftware.net!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!
ptn-nntp-spool03.plus.net!ptn-nntp-reader02.plus.net!not-for-mail
Quote:
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:64439
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

Chris,

With so many faulty reports apparently being submitted, is there
nothing that can be done to improve front end validation and/or
automate the collation of technical data by the reporting tool without
user input? e.g. surely data like Head End ID and Post Code should be
obtainable automatically.

If there really is nothing that can be done to improve data quality
then I wonder if any steps are taken to return the report to the
originator to seek clarification. It would be nice if one could see
the status of one's own report(s) to at least appreciate whether they
are being actioned or rejected etc..

It appears from what you are saying that the end user experience of
this process is that 94% of all error reports disappear into a black
hole, never to emerge. Is it any wonder that people are disillusioned
with this process, especially when perfectly valid reports for the
most simple of problems is met with "it can't be fixed because of
legel difficulties".

Can you please explain why many of the Sky +1 channels have now been
added to the guide but still have no data? What is illegal about
adding an hour to the start and end times of each programme and
publishing that schedule?

Can you explain why incorrect channel numbers still exist in the
guide, despite having been reported weeks ago, and despite the
channels also being listed with their correct channel numbers?

Something here still does not add up.

Regards,
Tim.

On Wed, 02 Nov 2005 20:34:51 GMT, a-chill@microsoft.com ("Chris Hill
[MSFT]") wrote:

Hi Nigel,

The issues that come through the website are reviewed and compared to
"known" issues, valid data and to see if there are enough details to
reproduce the issue. Very few of them contain this information. For
example here are the numbers from October 16th through October 22nd:

New reports: 63

Breakdown of bug numbers:

New bugs generated from reports: 4
Not an EPG issue: 3
Won't fix/By Design: 1
Duplicate reports: 1
Tech support request: 4
Not enough info, no cab/text file or no repro step reports: 50

In other words slightly more than 6% of the bug reports we received
actualy
contain the information I need to get them fixed. That is why I have
asked
a number of times that you include the following information in each
issue
even though it should be generated by the bug report and then post it
here
as a thread titled EPG: (Country).

Country:
TV Signal type:
Postal Code:
Headend Name:
Headend ID:
Detailed Description of the issue:

As for the new channels, that is something I'm working with the Program
Managers to get resolved. Its an uphill battle to get it changed but it
will happen mainly because of the feedback provided here in the
newsgroup.

Chris Hill
Windows Media Data Quality
EPG/DVD/CD/Games/MSN

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
--------------------
From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting
Dataservices
Message-ID: <o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com
References: <ps6sk191gt6bkbkqrnpo5urhohku7u3dng@4ax.com
#VvVea9zFHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
78gsk15tngl98pn0as04mmmh3akvft66cc@4ax.com
pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com
shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com
ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com
90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com
kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 21
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:02:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 16.19.192.182
X-Complaints-To: abuse@HP.com
X-Trace: news.cpqcorp.net 1130785364 16.19.192.182 (Mon, 31 Oct 2005
11:02:44 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:02:44 PST
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company
Path:

TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onl
i

ne.de!news.glorb.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.compaq.com!news.c
p
qcorp.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:63935
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:26:43 GMT, Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote:

There are two more major launches of new TV channels in the UK next
week
(Sky3 &
ITV4) on the Sky platform these are on channels 108 & 120
respectively.
Digiguide already has listings for Sky3 but as yet there is no sign
of
these
channels in the MCE EPG.

Any bets on whether the More4 debacle will be repeated?

I am not surprised to see that Sky3 is now broadcasting & there is no
entry in
the MCE EPG. ITV4 starts tomorrow & again there is no entry in the EPG.
Digiguide has the data. It seems pretty likely that BDS would have the
data so
why doesn't Microsoft have this data ready to download to our EPGs?

I'll log a problem on the web site but I have no confidence that
anybody
pays
any attention to these issues. Chris Hill of Microsoft seems to have
ducked for
cover & hasn't posted here for a while. I wonder why?

--
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur


--
To save on your shopping click here - http://www.rpoints.com/?ruid=44653
To sign up with PlusNet click here - http://tinyurl.com/b9wqs
Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:31 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi CJ,

Its not a cop-out but a statement of facts. I don't like having 94% of the
issue reports missing data. I really wish that I had the information need
to contact each one of you to get the missing information. However if that
information was collected there would be others who would get even angrier
and claim that Microsoft was tracking its customers (In all honesty every
single one of us has seen or heard of news reprots similar to this).
Please read the Privacy Policy for Microsoft and know that there are
restrictions on the information that we can collect and keep. I see the
94% of the issues and in some cases I can figure it out, but the #1 thing
you can do to increase the rate of solid information is to submit the issue
reports from the MCE system itself. In looking at the 94% that simple
thing would reduce that down below 50%. I would LOVE to have >50% of the
issues reported be filed as a bug.

Using your example what is the headend ID for TeleWest London? How about
all the other headends used throught England and Ireland that need these
channels added? That is how this information is generated by the
broadcasters themselves, not by the provider name. I can find out the
Headend ID for TeleWest but it takes me almost 15 minutes to dig through
the different databases that we receive to locate it. It takes BDS even
longer as they have to dig through an even larger database covering all of
europe and countries like Russia. I have posted the number of headends
that BDS deals with previously and now that several new countries have been
added it has more than doubled. By using the tool on the MCE system itself
we capture that information and I have it. This means that instead of
spending 15 minutes to research and file one issue, I can file 3 issues.
That is why its critical to use the form from the MCE system itself and why
I ask for it or the postal code and provider name when you put issues here.

If you e-mail issues directly to BDS it generally will end up adding around
4 days to the solution as the e-mail is sent to me and I have to send it to
a tester to get the required information such as Headend & Broadcaster ID
that is used by the databases. This information is collected by the tool
when you use a MCE system to file the bug and shortens the time I need to
get the bug fixed.

I have never claimed that the tool is perfect, in fact I'm probably the
most vocal about the issues it has. When I first saw it my initial
reaction was "Good first step, when will the rest of it show up?". This is
one of the many things that I work on when I'm not researching the missing
information in issue reports. Out of the work week, I spend 30 hours with
the EPG and almost 1/2 of it is researching the missing data for the issues
that have fallen into the 94% group.

CJ if you would like to go into deep details about the issues you are angry
about let me know. I would be more than happy to contact you off-line and
discuss them. I can almost promise that the issues you are getting angry
about are the exact same ones that I have. If nothing else it woud give
you a person, not a blank sheet of digital paper to vent the frustrations
with.

Thanks!
Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: "CJSnet" <usenet@TEETHthe-simpson.tv
References: <ps6sk191gt6bkbkqrnpo5urhohku7u3dng@4ax.com
#VvVea9zFHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl

<78gsk15tngl98pn0as04mmmh3akvft66cc@4ax.com>
<pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com>
<shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com>
<ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com>
<90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com>
<kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com>
<o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com>
<uCK2jz#3FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
Quote:
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2005 22:27:19 -0000
Lines: 151
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
Message-ID: <ubeGn7Y4FHA.4076@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
NNTP-Posting-Host: 82-43-123-29.cable.ubr02.mort.blueyonder.co.uk
82.43.123.29
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:64873
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

Chris this is a total cop-out and you know it. Sounds like you're quite
happy only having to do 6% of the work and ignoring 94% or errors because
there's 'not enough info', otherwise you'd make the web form foolproof,
or
at least send an auto-e-mail telling people you need more info.

I find this disgusting, knowing how many errors I've sent, to realise
even
though I gave all the info that would let you trace the fault, you may
not
have even bothered with it and filed it in the trash because it wasn't
the
specific info you desired.

How many users at home do you really expect to know what the hell a
Headend
ID is?

It is simple, for example with a recent issue, here is all the info you
need:

ITV4 AND SKY HAVE LAUNCHED 2 NEW CHANNELS IN THE UK BUT THEY DON'T APPEAR
ON
THE EPG FOR TELEWEST LONDON

If BDS really don't know what that means, then you all deserve for Media
Center to completely fail as a system, and at this rate it will.

WAKE UP FOR GOODNESS SAKE GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I am e-mailing BDS direct with this error, as they have no problem
speaking
English instead of headend flipping codes. They will fix the problem in
a
timely fashion.

I suggest we all bypass Chris Hill and the online EPG report form, as
it's
clearly totally pointless as they willingly ignore 94% of our good
efforts.

Totally pathetic, sorry, you've really angered me now.
--
CJSnet

(Remove TEETH to reply by e-mail.)


""Chris Hill [MSFT]"" <a-chill@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:uCK2jz%233FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
Hi Nigel,

The issues that come through the website are reviewed and compared to
"known" issues, valid data and to see if there are enough details to
reproduce the issue. Very few of them contain this information. For
example here are the numbers from October 16th through October 22nd:

New reports: 63

Breakdown of bug numbers:

New bugs generated from reports: 4
Not an EPG issue: 3
Won't fix/By Design: 1
Duplicate reports: 1
Tech support request: 4
Not enough info, no cab/text file or no repro step reports: 50

In other words slightly more than 6% of the bug reports we received
actualy
contain the information I need to get them fixed. That is why I have
asked
a number of times that you include the following information in each
issue
even though it should be generated by the bug report and then post it
here
as a thread titled EPG: (Country).

Country:
TV Signal type:
Postal Code:
Headend Name:
Headend ID:
Detailed Description of the issue:

As for the new channels, that is something I'm working with the Program
Managers to get resolved. Its an uphill battle to get it changed but it
will happen mainly because of the feedback provided here in the
newsgroup.

Chris Hill
Windows Media Data Quality
EPG/DVD/CD/Games/MSN

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
--------------------
From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting
Dataservices
Message-ID: <o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com
References: <ps6sk191gt6bkbkqrnpo5urhohku7u3dng@4ax.com
#VvVea9zFHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl
78gsk15tngl98pn0as04mmmh3akvft66cc@4ax.com
pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com
shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com
ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com
90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com
kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 21
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 19:02:44 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 16.19.192.182
X-Complaints-To: abuse@HP.com
X-Trace: news.cpqcorp.net 1130785364 16.19.192.182 (Mon, 31 Oct 2005
11:02:44 PST)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 11:02:44 PST
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company
Path:

TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli

ne.de!news.glorb.com!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug.co.nz!news.compaq.com!news.cp
qcorp.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:63935
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

On Sat, 29 Oct 2005 09:26:43 GMT, Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com> wrote:

There are two more major launches of new TV channels in the UK next
week
(Sky3 &
ITV4) on the Sky platform these are on channels 108 & 120
respectively.
Digiguide already has listings for Sky3 but as yet there is no sign of
these
channels in the MCE EPG.

Any bets on whether the More4 debacle will be repeated?

I am not surprised to see that Sky3 is now broadcasting & there is no
entry in
the MCE EPG. ITV4 starts tomorrow & again there is no entry in the EPG.
Digiguide has the data. It seems pretty likely that BDS would have the
data so
why doesn't Microsoft have this data ready to download to our EPGs?

I'll log a problem on the web site but I have no confidence that
anybody
pays
any attention to these issues. Chris Hill of Microsoft seems to have
ducked for
cover & hasn't posted here for a while. I wonder why?

--
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur




Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:37 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi Martin,

The general issue is that the EPG is a "new" concept to many people. In
the software industry when you approve something and its released to the
public you go to the next project. That is not reality with the EPG. Once
its available to the public you need to spend even more time working with
it to keep everything up to date. This is more of an educational process
that is taking place. If the contact information were provided, this would
end up reverting to the way it was previously where there wasn't anybody
here that could suggest the needed changes. Is that something you really
want?

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
Thread-Topic: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting
Dataservices
thread-index: AcXf/xECyGYuu+tkR0qeGsCX9kQj2Q==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 80.177.164.96
From: "=?Utf-8?B?TWFydGluIEtpcms=?="
MartinKirk@discussions.microsoft.com
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
93243F4A-81F0-44E7-AA38-83A2C898C33E@microsoft.com

<eWeokxRzFHA.1132@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
<212EA081-0EA3-4F61-9351-5E1299DC2275@microsoft.com>
<OCclxcXzFHA.3892@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
<Wt3ai93zFHA.1172@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<ps6sk191gt6bkbkqrnpo5urhohku7u3dng@4ax.com>
<#VvVea9zFHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl>
<78gsk15tngl98pn0as04mmmh3akvft66cc@4ax.com>
<pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com>
<shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com>
<ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com>
<90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com>
<kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com>
<o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com>
<uCK2jz#3FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
Quote:
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:45:04 -0800
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <EF38E583-1C00-4CB4-A136-72559FE31E03@microsoft.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:64457
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter


""Chris Hill [MSFT]"" wrote:


As for the new channels, that is something I'm working with the Program
Managers to get resolved. Its an uphill battle to get it changed but
it
will happen mainly because of the feedback provided here in the
newsgroup.


I don't suppose you would care to provide contact information for the
blocking offenders. :) It hardly seems fair for you to have to bear the
full
weight of opprobrium of the user community!! I fail to see why they
should be
making it an uphill battle. Have they no conception of the service they
are
supposed to be providing? Do they actually use MCE? If they did, I am
sure
they would be as frustrated as the rest of us!!

Regards,

Martin


Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:42 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Thank you for the information. Since there are several digital Sat feeds
can you tell me which of the following you are refering to?

Digital Satellite - unmapped line-up for the UK
ASTRA 28.2 East (Sky Digital) Free Services Lineup
ASTRA 19.2 East Free Services Lineup
Sky Digital BBC Scot/ITV Grampian

Once I have that I can file a bug and get the resolution process started.
Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
Thread-Topic: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting
Dataservices
thread-index: AcXf/l2aYSbLhyNNQdujFzB5feNZBw==
X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 80.177.164.96
From: "=?Utf-8?B?TWFydGluIEtpcms=?="
MartinKirk@discussions.microsoft.com
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
93243F4A-81F0-44E7-AA38-83A2C898C33E@microsoft.com

<eWeokxRzFHA.1132@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
<212EA081-0EA3-4F61-9351-5E1299DC2275@microsoft.com>
<OCclxcXzFHA.3892@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl>
<Wt3ai93zFHA.1172@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<ps6sk191gt6bkbkqrnpo5urhohku7u3dng@4ax.com>
<#VvVea9zFHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl>
<78gsk15tngl98pn0as04mmmh3akvft66cc@4ax.com>
<pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com>
<shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com>
<ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com>
<90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com>
<kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com>
<o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com>
<uCK2jz#3FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
Quote:
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 14:40:03 -0800
Lines: 64
Message-ID: <4CF7656C-09CD-4983-B201-E214A3086FAE@microsoft.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
Importance: normal
Priority: normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:64456
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter



New reports: 63

Breakdown of bug numbers:

New bugs generated from reports: 4
Not an EPG issue: 3
Won't fix/By Design: 1
Duplicate reports: 1
Tech support request: 4
Not enough info, no cab/text file or no repro step reports: 50

In other words slightly more than 6% of the bug reports we received
actualy
contain the information I need to get them fixed. That is why I have
asked
a number of times that you include the following information in each
issue
even though it should be generated by the bug report and then post it
here
as a thread titled EPG: (Country).

Country:
TV Signal type:
Postal Code:
Headend Name:
Headend ID:
Detailed Description of the issue:

Since I am sure that everyone that files a report fills in the fields
provided, surely any problem with missing data must lie with the data
generation/collection mechanism. I assume that it is in order to get this
information that the Error Reporting mechanism is used. Unless this
mechanism
is broken, I assume that missing data is due to people cancelling the
"Send
Report" dialog. perhaps it should ne made clearer in the web page that
you
HAVE to send this report in order for the process to be complete. The
process
used is sufficiently unlike most other error reporting processes (where
everything is self-contained on the web page) thai I imagine a
significant
number of people are confused.

I would have thought that a 94% failure rate would lead to a thorough
review
of the reporting mechanism, rather than dismissing it as user error!

Anyway, here is my report with such information as I can get from my MCE
installation:

(There is no Headend information in the Guide About page. I assume it is
not
applicable for the Sky platform as there is effectively only one
transmitter
for the whole country, which should make it easy to get right.)

Country: UK
TV Signal type: Digital Satellite
Postal Code: IV2 4NP
Headend Name: ?????
Headend ID: ?????
Detailed Description of the issue:

Channel 108, SKY3, is missing and has no program listsings
Channel 107, SKY2, is still labelled SKYMIX
Channel 114, LIVING TV2, has no program listings
Channel 122, CHallenge+1, has no progran listings
Channel 128, Paramount Comedy+1, is missing and has no program listings
Channel 134, Discovery Real Time+1, is still labelled Home&Leisure+1
Channel 135, Discover Real Time Extra, has no program listings
Channel 270, FX, appears on its old channel number, 289
Channel 271, FX+2, has no progran listings

Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:42 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Thank you Robert.


Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: "Robert Schlabbach" <robert_s@gmx.net
References: <ps6sk191gt6bkbkqrnpo5urhohku7u3dng@4ax.com
#VvVea9zFHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl

<78gsk15tngl98pn0as04mmmh3akvft66cc@4ax.com>
<pp33Z3C0FHA.1144@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com>
<shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com>
<ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com>
<90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com>
<kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com>
<o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com>
<uCK2jz#3FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<ubeGn7Y4FHA.4076@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl>
Quote:
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2005 02:37:33 +0100
Lines: 27
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4952.2800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4952.2800
Message-ID: <eQ7Jxla4FHA.1188@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
NNTP-Posting-Host: p54BF005F.dip0.t-ipconnect.de 84.191.0.95
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:64891
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

"CJSnet" <usenet@TEETHthe-simpson.tv> wrote in message
news:ubeGn7Y4FHA.4076@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
I suggest we all bypass Chris Hill and the online EPG report form,

This is the completely wrong approach. Chris is the guy who - for the
first
time since MCE was launched in Europe back in 2003!!! - is actually
telling
us what's going on with the EPG and starting to move things. Our EPG error
submissions have _always_ been ignored, but for the first time someone
tells us what's happening.

If anything, we should back up Chris best we can in his endeavour to
improve the EPG service for us. If you "bypass" him, he won't have
anything
to show to his superiors to convince them that change is badly needed.
Instead, *do* keep submitting your EPG errors via the online report form.
It's true, only numbers count at Microsoft - or at _any_ major
corporation.
Think about it - which superior would respond to "Uh, we have 3 unhappy
customers in the newsgroup"? Compare this to "Hey, we have hundreds of
unresolved EPG service error reports from our customers, right here in our
database!" and you get the picture...

Regards,«
--
Robert Schlabbach
e-mail: robert_s@gmx.net
Berlin, Germany


Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 8:48 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi Dave,

Yes the 94% failure rate was something that I have pointed out repeatedly
in my efforts to get a new tool created. Until I actually started tracking
the numbers (one of the reasons I was brought in), it wasn't actually a
known factor so assumptions were made. Remember that while Microsoft is a
large company, people work here and in some cases don't have all the
information needed. Thats my job, provide the numbers to support the my
suggested changes.

If I could have my dream tool it would start with a MCE interface that Only
required you to specify what actually happened and what you expected to
happen and then it would gather everything up and send it directly to the
partners. Reality says that will not happen anytime soon so I am driving
small steps that are easier to deal with. One day you will look up and
realise that the tool was created along the way. Dream? You bet but there
is hope.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: David Lowndes <davidl@example.invalid
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 00:33:44 +0000
Message-ID: <eemim1dod204mamebs3f2q8g7u8qbeubj3@4ax.com
References: <34iuk1tgk6ha8b4md71851i21l158ks9eh@4ax.com
shJIRgA7AkUDFwRY@iconia.org.uk> <ejrBolm0FHA.3856@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl

<D83C7ED7-578D-4269-BE95-823902FD0F21@microsoft.com>
<ed55m11igo62dqv4qp3l8o640j6p4l2qah@4ax.com>
<90c5m1hvru8o49ai53as97gqet8a61liqk@4ax.com>
<kbd6m19kcveksa6r0srliahnad5173vjcd@4ax.com>
<o0lcm1d9r9bi4sg870812m4ii348beibhi@4ax.com>
<uCK2jz#3FHA.2904@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<4CF7656C-09CD-4983-B201-E214A3086FAE@microsoft.com>
Quote:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.0/32.763
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
NNTP-Posting-Host: i-195-137-121-142.freedom2surf.net 195.137.121.142
Lines: 1
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:64475
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

Unless this mechanism
is broken, I assume that missing data is due to people cancelling the
"Send
Report" dialog.

Which is not surprising when it's the same UI that people see when an
application crashes!

The process
used is sufficiently unlike most other error reporting processes (where
everything is self-contained on the web page) thai I imagine a
significant
number of people are confused.

I agree.

I would have thought that a 94% failure rate would lead to a thorough
review
of the reporting mechanism, rather than dismissing it as user error!

Indeed.

Dave
--
MVP VC++ FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
Back to top
Tiny Tim
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 9:27 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Chris,

Thanks for getting back to each of us. One further point about the
reporting tool - I'm using Sky Digital Satellite and when trying to
complete a report I am asked to select a TV region. Well first of all,
my exact combination of BBC London, ITV London is not offered, so I
can't choose it. Secondly, this data is defined in the system - the
system tells me that that is my region. Why is that data capture not
automated by the tool?

Cheers,
Tim.

On Sat, 05 Nov 2005 02:42:01 GMT, a-chill@microsoft.com ("Chris Hill
[MSFT]") wrote:

Quote:
Thank you for the information. Since there are several digital Sat feeds
can you tell me which of the following you are refering to?

Digital Satellite - unmapped line-up for the UK
ASTRA 28.2 East (Sky Digital) Free Services Lineup
ASTRA 19.2 East Free Services Lineup
Sky Digital BBC Scot/ITV Grampian

Once I have that I can file a bug and get the resolution process started.
Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

--
To save on your shopping click here - http://www.rpoints.com/?ruid=44653
To sign up with PlusNet click here - http://tinyurl.com/b9wqs
Back to top
David Lowndes
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 3:40 pm    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Chris,

Thanks for the follow up, but can you answer this...

Why, after several days is there still no data available for the newly
released ITV4 channel (FreeView #30), and Sky3 is still showing the
programming for Sky Travel?

Are you aware of this issue?

Dave
--
MVP VC++ FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
Back to top
David Lowndes
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 4:04 pm    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Quote:
you can do to increase the rate of solid information is to submit the issue
reports from the MCE system itself.

Since many MCE systems will be connected (only) to TVs, it's very
difficult to use a web browser (or any other normal 2' Windows UI)
from them. I can barely read the text on our TV.

As CJSnet said:

"It is simple, for example with a recent issue, here is all the info
you need:
ITV4 AND SKY HAVE LAUNCHED 2 NEW CHANNELS IN THE UK BUT THEY DON'T
APPEAR ON THE EPG FOR TELEWEST LONDON
"

The same applies for FreeView too, so it's obviously a common issue.

Why should reports of this get lost just because they don't come from
the MCE system.

If you really have to have the EPG reports from the MCE system, the
reporting system should only be available from an MCE machine.

Dave
--
MVP VC++ FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
Back to top
Tiny Tim
Guest





Posted: Sat Nov 05, 2005 5:27 pm    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

On Sat, 5 Nov 2005 13:17:38 +0100, "Robert Schlabbach"
<robert_s@gmx.net> wrote:

Quote:
"David Lowndes" <davidl@example.invalid> wrote in message
news:5k0pm1dg4he8blrje7g6aiiae1115b54vl@4ax.com...
As CJSnet said:

"It is simple, for example with a recent issue, here is all the info
you need:
ITV4 AND SKY HAVE LAUNCHED 2 NEW CHANNELS IN THE UK BUT THEY DON'T
APPEAR ON THE EPG FOR TELEWEST LONDON
"

The same applies for FreeView too, so it's obviously a common issue.

And that's probably what makes it so hard to fix. If it was a wrong channel
on only one lineup, that'd be an easy one. But this appears to affect
pretty much all lineups in the UK. How many of those did Chris say there
were? 16,000? Would you want to go through 16,000 lineups and update
them...? Now if you think "bah, I'll just do search&replace" - what if that
operation goes wrong and ends up wrecking 16,000 records...? Then you'll
have a real problem.

I'm afraid Microsoft has to be very cautious about such MAJOR changes
(simple as they may seem to the individual), and that's what makes it take
so long...

Regards,«

So, Robert, are you suggesting that nothing gets done to remedy this
until an error report has been raised for all platforms in every
subscription area in the whole UK? It shouldn't even be a
retrospective fix. The coming of these channels is common public
knowledge. Microsoft should have been pre-emptive with the guide
updates, not wait for error reports to trickle in. What a bloody
stupid process model that is!!

--
To save on your shopping click here - http://www.rpoints.com/?ruid=44653
To sign up with PlusNet click here - http://tinyurl.com/b9wqs
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WinXPTalk.com Forum Index -> Windows XP Media Center Edition All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Page 10 of 12

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Office Forums Access Forums Windows Server Exchange Server Help
New Topics Powered by phpBB