EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservice
WinXPTalk.com Forum Index WinXPTalk.com
Forums for Windows XP users.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web winxptalk.com
EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservice
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 10, 11, 12  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WinXPTalk.com Forum Index -> Windows XP Media Center Edition
Author Message
Coderanger
Guest





Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 12:28 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Quote:
I appreciate and understand your concerns with issues involving data
quality within the MCE guide.
Why don't you give the guys at DigiGuide a call, I know they supply

listings data directly now and support over 450 channels including Sky
Box Office, Front Row and all the +1's mentioned in this thread.

You can contact them at http://listings.digiguide.com/services/, I am
sure they would love to do a deal.
Back to top
Nigel Barker
Guest





Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 2:29 pm    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:54:19 +0100, "CJSnet" <usenet@TEETHthe-simpson.tv> wrote:

Quote:
Hi Chris, thanks for the reply, but I think this is going a bit far. They
should have all this info - it is very obvious and is regularly advertised!
As for the EPG report guide, I reported these issues months ago so clearly
that doesn't work either.

It would be more reassuring if when one reported an EPG error that there was
actually some acknowledgement like an email & a log number so that you could
track progress of checking the error. Take a look at Digiguide they take
inaccuracies seriously & have an excellent response & follow-up.

--
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur
Back to top
Guest






Posted: Wed Sep 21, 2005 9:52 pm    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

You're thinking of our Listings Issues System;
-->http://listings.digiguide.com/issues.asp

russ.
Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 12:28 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi Nigel,

I am working with several groups that have a stake in this type of change
so that this can be addressed. I have been working on this and it will
happen, I just don't have any solid ETA as this type of change will
directly impact several different groups.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: Nigel Barker <nigel@hp.com
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Message-ID: <g282j1l87epsol8gf8esfusp1htjs27u8k@4ax.com
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
8Zko2wYtFHA.656@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl

<#g#8fRuuFHA.3756@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<132mi151mf9691jhr0g0r9hm4do7gs2uge@4ax.com>
<fE84PhTvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<uynb30gvFHA.1988@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl>
Quote:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 15
Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 09:29:40 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 16.188.145.30
X-Complaints-To: abuse@HP.com
X-Trace: news.cpqcorp.net 1127294980 16.188.145.30 (Wed, 21 Sep 2005
02:29:40 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 21 Sep 2005 02:29:40 PDT
Organization: Hewlett-Packard Company
Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli

ne.de!newshub.sdsu.edu!peer01.west.cox.net!cox.net!newsfeeds.ihug.co.nz!ihug
..co.nz!news.compaq.com!news.cpqcorp.net!53ab2750!not-for-mail
Quote:
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:58316
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:54:19 +0100, "CJSnet" <usenet@TEETHthe-simpson.tv
wrote:

Hi Chris, thanks for the reply, but I think this is going a bit far.
They
should have all this info - it is very obvious and is regularly
advertised!
As for the EPG report guide, I reported these issues months ago so
clearly
that doesn't work either.

It would be more reassuring if when one reported an EPG error that there
was
actually some acknowledgement like an email & a log number so that you
could
track progress of checking the error. Take a look at Digiguide they take
inaccuracies seriously & have an excellent response & follow-up.

--
Nigel Barker
Live from the sunny Cote d'Azur
Back to top
Doug Knox MS-MVP
Guest





Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 12:28 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Very cool, Chris! Thanks for sharing this with us.

--
Doug Knox, MS-MVP Windows Media Center\Windows Powered Smart Display\Security
Win 95/98/Me/XP Tweaks and Fixes
http://www.dougknox.com
--------------------------------
Per user Group Policy Restrictions for XP Home and XP Pro
http://www.dougknox.com/xp/utils/xp_securityconsole.htm
--------------------------------
Please reply only to the newsgroup so all may benefit.
Unsolicited e-mail is not answered.

""Chris Hill [MSFT]"" <a-chill@microsoft.com> wrote in message news:j8K95xvvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Hi CJ,

Since I have assumed the responsibility for the EPG data quality, I have
discovered several components that were not operating at peak efficiency.
Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 12:28 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi Tim,

Thank you for the informational links. It sped up my research and I now
have enough information to get this addressed ASAP with our partner. I've
talked with them and they are giving this the highest priority considering
how long ago these changes were reported.


Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: Tiny Tim
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 10:32:31 +0100
Message-ID: <ltkvi1tmktm7m3b7kguhm3269rg2116ot7@4ax.com
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
8Zko2wYtFHA.656@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl

<#g#8fRuuFHA.3756@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<132mi151mf9691jhr0g0r9hm4do7gs2uge@4ax.com>
<fE84PhTvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<grbui1du839gkqmctj3dqchhpccbpqd28e@4ax.com>
<wCK9h7XvFHA.3020@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
Quote:
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.0/32.763
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 154
Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 7b6b9362.ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net
X-Trace:
DXC=FOLcEbVmN0j2HSD]`WN8?migd3Y`7Rb;n3_LeXC3B]SioL71Q8QE1ha;9W99S^I<EiCBUkc[

PEkYgXRRE?Zhm6fd
Quote:
X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net
Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.

sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeeder.wxs.nl!ams
news11.chello.com!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!zen.net.uk
!dedekind.zen.co.uk!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder01.plus.net!ptn-nnt
p-spool01.plus.net!ptn-nntp-reader04.plus.net!not-for-mail
Quote:
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:58132
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

Chris,

Thanks for the quick reply. Here is the web address for Paramount
Comedy in the UK - http://www.paramountcomedy.co.uk/home/ .
Unfortunately the website seems next to useless in clarifying its
channel lineup.

If you go to the Sky website here -
http://www.sky.com/skycom/tvguide/0,,715-0,00.html - you can pull up
schedules for...

(127) Paramount Comedy
(128) Paramount Comedy +1
(129) Paramount 2

You'll also see listings for some of the other missing channels
including (281) ABC1, (271) FX+2 etc..

There is a news report here -
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds23913.html and another here -
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/article/ds23770.html .

It looks like continuous change is the name of the game so someone at
Microsoft really needs a more proactive approach to all this. See here
- http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/broadcasting/upcoming/ .

Aaahh! Just found this channel line up with website links and it seems
to include the glaring omissions from the MCE EPG -
http://www.digitalspy.co.uk/satellite/epg/ .

HTH,
Tim :-)

On Tue, 20 Sep 2005 01:01:46 GMT, a-chill@microsoft.com ("Chris Hill
[MSFT]") wrote:

Hi Tim,

Thank you for posting the information for me. I've started looking into
this issue and have some preliminary information for you. While its not
a
complete answer to every issue you mentioned, its a start.

114 Living TV 2 - Investigating
128 Paramount Comedy +1 - Can you provide me a link to the
broadcaster's
site?
129 Paramount 2 - Investigating
135 Discovery Real Time Extra - Investigating
140 Sky Travel +1 - This is showing in the guide, however the data is
missing and I have asked BDS to correct this.
155 Discovery Home & Health +1 - Currently not contracted for data. We
should still show the channel in guide so a bug is opened with BDS.
188 Reality TV +1 - Investigating
256 UK TV G2 +1 - Investigating
270 FX - Showing as channel 289 in our data. I'm assuming that 270 is
the
correct channel so will notify BDS of change.
271 FX +2 - Investigating
281 ABC1 - Investigating
591 UK TV People +1 - Investigating

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
--------------------
From: Tiny Tim

I already filed such a report using the EPG error reporting tool and
have had no response and seen zero corrections applied. Is there any
point in repeating the exercise or should I just sit back and hope
that enough other people make enough noise to make a difference?

There are now so many discrepancies with Sky Digital that it is
getting onerous to actually trawl through and find all the errors and
omissions.

Here are the errors/omissions I've spotted that I am interested in,
but there are many other channels missing too.....

Post Code = RM14 1QU
Headend ID = 210193
Signal Type = Digital Satellite Set Top Box
Provider = Sky
Country = UK (England)

Errors.....

Sky Channel...........................MCE Status
114 Living TV 2........................Missing
128 Paramount Comedy +1.........Missing
129 Paramount 2......................Wrongly numbered as 128
135 Discovery Real Time Extra.....Missing
140 Sky Travel +1....................Missing
155 Discovery Home & Health +1..Missing
188 Reality TV +1....................Missing
256 UK TV G2 +1.....................Missing
270 FX................................(was) wrongly numbered as 289
271 FX +2.............................Missing
281 ABC1..............................Missing
591 UK TV People +1................Missing

These are the ones that most affect/annoy me but in total the missing
channels run into the dozens, beyond the list above. That isn't just
shopping channels and "play to win", texting and dating channels but
proper film, documentary and drama channels too.

HTH,
Tim.


On Mon, 19 Sep 2005 16:36:35 GMT, a-chill@microsoft.com ("Chris Hill
[MSFT]") wrote:

Hi Folks,

I appreciate and understand your concerns with issues involving data
quality within the MCE guide. I have a regularly scheduled
conference
call
with out partners to discuss data quality issues and will bring this
up
during the next call. Before I can deal with this specific issue,
there
is
specific information I need such as the Headend ID, channels, postal
code,
provider name, signal type, Etc. The headend ID can be obtained by
going
into Settings, TV, Guide, About Guide Listings. It will be marked as
ID
in
the lower 1/2 of the screen (or you can do a screen capture of that
screen
and attach it to your reply). Here is a list of the information I
need:

Postal Code:
Headend ID:
Signal Type (Terrestrial/Cable/DVB-T/Sat):
Provider ID (Sky, Telewest etc):
Country:

If possible the URL to the actual provider's website with the current
channel lineup that I can provide BDS to ensure they get accurate
information.

While I know that more people will respond please use the EPG
reporting
links as the first response. I only check these websites once a week
while
I receive the reproducible EPG quality issues on a daily basis.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 12:28 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi Dan,

Thank you for the suggestion. When we started the quest for program data
providers several were contacted with our requirments. I was not involved
in that, however BDS was the partner of choice and they have been working
hard to meet our requirments. One consideration was that there are over
26,000 unique headends that we need data for on a daily basis. This is a
stagering number and BDS has done an excellent job of providing the data.
This is not to say they are perfect and don't have room to improve, but
they are doing something that many companies were not willing or able to do
at that time.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: "Coderanger" <danp@coderanger.com
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: 20 Sep 2005 13:44:46 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <1127249086.418341.184640@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
8Zko2wYtFHA.656@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
#g#8fRuuFHA.3756@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
132mi151mf9691jhr0g0r9hm4do7gs2uge@4ax.com
fE84PhTvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.6.234.71
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1127249092 17367 127.0.0.1 (20 Sep 2005
20:44:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:44:52 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
.NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50215),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.6.234.71;
posting-account=8BG_fwwAAACnfTBgMuF1C25m6j0H20ew
Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli

ne.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.gigan
ews.com!postnews.google.com!g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Quote:
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:58250
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

I appreciate and understand your concerns with issues involving data
quality within the MCE guide.
Why don't you give the guys at DigiGuide a call, I know they supply
listings data directly now and support over 450 channels including Sky
Box Office, Front Row and all the +1's mentioned in this thread.

You can contact them at http://listings.digiguide.com/services/, I am
sure they would love to do a deal.

Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 12:28 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi CJ,

Since I have assumed the responsibility for the EPG data quality, I have
discovered several components that were not operating at peak efficiency.
Several of these have been changed following my suggestions while others
are still being worked. This takes time and will improve the process and
provide higher quality feedback to MS, our partners and to those who report
these issues. This is not to say that we didn't value the feedback and
suggestions received before April, we didn't have anybody available to
focus 100% of their energy on existing issues.

For those who are actually curious about the changes, here is a list of a
few of the changes that have been implemented since April:

- Real time communication of quality issues with our partners.
- Monitoring of the MCE newsgroups for program guide data issues
- Monitoring of the MSN feedback sites for data quality issues
- Data Quality validation on random feeds using a separate quality test
server
- Clear escalation path for issues that take longer than 7 work days to
resolve
- Weekly reports giving accurate information based upon each country,
partner, data type and comparison to previous weeks
- Quarterly reports giving detailed information compared to previous
quarter and same quarter the previous year
- Restructuring of feedback servers to ensure that we receive quality data
for EPG issues.
- Assisting partners in establishing relationships with partners to provide
timely & accurate information
- One person 100% dedicated to data quality and a second one dedicating 80%
of their time.
- "In Country Testers" verifing the "fixed" quality issues.

This list is less than 1/3 of the suggestions that have been made and will
be implemented as time allows.

The next change that is in the works (no eta due to the scope of the
changes), is the ability to resolve the appearance of a "black hole" when
data quality issues are reported.

I welcome all constructive suggestions and feedback.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

--------------------
Quote:
From: "CJSnet" <usenet@TEETHthe-simpson.tv
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
8Zko2wYtFHA.656@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl

<#g#8fRuuFHA.3756@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<132mi151mf9691jhr0g0r9hm4do7gs2uge@4ax.com>
<fE84PhTvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
Quote:
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 18:54:19 +0100
Lines: 130
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670
X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670
Message-ID: <uynb30gvFHA.1988@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
NNTP-Posting-Host: host86-129-218-166.range86-129.btcentralplus.com
86.129.218.166
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:58204
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

Hi Chris, thanks for the reply, but I think this is going a bit far.
They
should have all this info - it is very obvious and is regularly
advertised!
As for the EPG report guide, I reported these issues months ago so
clearly
that doesn't work either.

Here is the info I have to hand:
Postal Code: TW9
Headend ID:
Signal Type (Terrestrial/Cable/DVB-T/Sat): Cable
Provider ID (Sky, Telewest etc): Telewest
Country: UK

I have already explained in this thread the channels affected, incl E4+1,
Living, Living+1.
--
Thanks.

CJSnet

(Remove TEETH to reply by e-mail.)



""Chris Hill [MSFT]"" <a-chill@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:fE84PhTvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
Hi Folks,

I appreciate and understand your concerns with issues involving data
quality within the MCE guide. I have a regularly scheduled conference
call
with out partners to discuss data quality issues and will bring this up
during the next call. Before I can deal with this specific issue,
there
is
specific information I need such as the Headend ID, channels, postal
code,
provider name, signal type, Etc. The headend ID can be obtained by
going
into Settings, TV, Guide, About Guide Listings. It will be marked as
ID
in
the lower 1/2 of the screen (or you can do a screen capture of that
screen
and attach it to your reply). Here is a list of the information I need:



If possible the URL to the actual provider's website with the current
channel lineup that I can provide BDS to ensure they get accurate
information.

While I know that more people will respond please use the EPG reporting
links as the first response. I only check these websites once a week
while
I receive the reproducible EPG quality issues on a daily basis.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.

--------------------
From: Tiny Tim
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting
Dataservices
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:06:16 +0100
Message-ID: <132mi151mf9691jhr0g0r9hm4do7gs2uge@4ax.com
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
8Zko2wYtFHA.656@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
#g#8fRuuFHA.3756@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.0/32.763
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 33
Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9d9d795a.ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net
X-Trace:

DXC=[k<J6<QWmC1oP_n1HW];Q0igd3Y`7Rb;>@`8gV4CC7I7f`WFn?WW=53?4\5R7Lfbh2CBUkc[
PEkY72SknD3KcmG6
X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net
Path:

TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli

ne.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.

ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!proxad.net!news.clara.net!wagner.news.cla

ra.net!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder02.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool02.plu
s.net!ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net!not-for-mail
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:57781
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

I'd like to echo those sentiments. Sky makes several channel changes
every few months, including renumbering channels and adding new ones.
There was a big reshuffle a couple of weeks ago. This changes are not
reflected in MCE yet. But neither are changes made many months ago.
Digiguide manages to keep pace with the changes pretty well!

What seems odd, and frustrating is that some very niche foreign
channels are in the guide but lots and lots of regular English
speaking channels are absent or wrongly numbered.

Even if it needs negotiation to get data for new channels, how hard
can it be to at least renumber where required. Also, where the missing
channels are simply of the +1 or +2 type, how hard would it really be
to sort out the guide for these?

Please expedite a fix.

Regards,
Tim.

On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:29:23 +0100, "CJSnet"
usenet@TEETHthe-simpson.tv> wrote:

Chris, I'm not saying it's necessarily you, but somebody isn't doing
their
job properly at all.

E4+1 on channel 145 of Telewest is still not appearing in the Guide or
as a
channel.
The Living TV channel number changes have still not happened.

Do you appreciate that waiting two months after my service provider
starts
broadcasting a channel, before I can view or schedule recordings from
it, is
absolutely unacceptable?




Back to top
Robert Schlabbach
Guest





Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 8:18 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

I don't believe there ever was a problem with the MCE EPG service for the
USA/Canada. It's the service for the European countries which was never
satisfactory. But knowing that Chris is now on the job surely is hope that
the situation might finally improve (hey, it's only been 2 years since MCE
was first launched in Europe...) Now it's worth my time taking another look
if my long-time EPG issues still persist...

Regards,«
--
Robert Schlabbach
e-mail: robert_s@gmx.net
Berlin, Germany

"Dana Cline - MVP" <dcline@scriptpro.com> wrote in message news:OtZtzCUvFHA.1252@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
Quote:
Chris,

For what it's worth, I had a good response recently on the EPG. In Kansas
City KS, our provider Everest Cable changed some of the channel numbers
around on a Friday. I emailed zap2it.com on Saturday, using the address
provided on their web site and supplying all the information they
requested. The electronic guide was corrected as of Monday afternoon
when I got home from work.

Dana Cline - MVP

""Chris Hill [MSFT]"" <a-chill@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:fE84PhTvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
Hi Folks,

I appreciate and understand your concerns with issues involving data
quality within the MCE guide. I have a regularly scheduled conference
call
with out partners to discuss data quality issues and will bring this up
during the next call. Before I can deal with this specific issue, there
is
specific information I need such as the Headend ID, channels, postal code,
provider name, signal type, Etc. The headend ID can be obtained by going
into Settings, TV, Guide, About Guide Listings. It will be marked as ID
in
the lower 1/2 of the screen (or you can do a screen capture of that screen
and attach it to your reply). Here is a list of the information I need:

Postal Code:
Headend ID:
Signal Type (Terrestrial/Cable/DVB-T/Sat):
Provider ID (Sky, Telewest etc):
Country:


If possible the URL to the actual provider's website with the current
channel lineup that I can provide BDS to ensure they get accurate
information.

While I know that more people will respond please use the EPG reporting
links as the first response. I only check these websites once a week
while
I receive the reproducible EPG quality issues on a daily basis.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.

--------------------
From: Tiny Tim
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting
Dataservices
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:06:16 +0100
Message-ID: <132mi151mf9691jhr0g0r9hm4do7gs2uge@4ax.com
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
8Zko2wYtFHA.656@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
#g#8fRuuFHA.3756@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.0/32.763
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 33
Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9d9d795a.ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net
X-Trace:


DXC=[k<J6<QWmC1oP_n1HW];Q0igd3Y`7Rb;>@`8gV4CC7I7f`WFn?WW=53?4\5R7Lfbh2CBUkc

[
Quote:
PEkY72SknD3KcmG6
X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net
Path:


TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onl

i
Quote:


ne.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp

..
Quote:


ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!proxad.net!news.clara.net!wagner.news.cl

a
Quote:


ra.net!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder02.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool02.pl

u
Quote:
s.net!ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net!not-for-mail
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:57781
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

I'd like to echo those sentiments. Sky makes several channel changes
every few months, including renumbering channels and adding new ones.
There was a big reshuffle a couple of weeks ago. This changes are not
reflected in MCE yet. But neither are changes made many months ago.
Digiguide manages to keep pace with the changes pretty well!

What seems odd, and frustrating is that some very niche foreign
channels are in the guide but lots and lots of regular English
speaking channels are absent or wrongly numbered.

Even if it needs negotiation to get data for new channels, how hard
can it be to at least renumber where required. Also, where the
missing
channels are simply of the +1 or +2 type, how hard would it really be
to sort out the guide for these?

Please expedite a fix.

Regards,
Tim.

On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:29:23 +0100, "CJSnet"
usenet@TEETHthe-simpson.tv> wrote:

Chris, I'm not saying it's necessarily you, but somebody isn't doing
their
job properly at all.

E4+1 on channel 145 of Telewest is still not appearing in the Guide
or
as a
channel.
The Living TV channel number changes have still not happened.

Do you appreciate that waiting two months after my service provider
starts
broadcasting a channel, before I can view or schedule recordings
from
it, is
absolutely unacceptable?



Back to top
Robert Schlabbach
Guest





Posted: Thu Sep 22, 2005 8:20 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

"Coderanger" <danp@coderanger.com> wrote in message
news:1127249086.418341.184640@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Quote:
You can contact them at http://listings.digiguide.com/services/,
I am sure they would love to do a deal.

Only UK and Ireland, apparently. Microsoft has a "pan-European" EPG
provider with BDS, and I don't really think they'd be willing to do an
extra contract only for two European countries...

Regards,«
--
Robert Schlabbach
e-mail: robert_s@gmx.net
Berlin, Germany
Back to top
Chris Hill [MSFT]
Guest





Posted: Sat Sep 24, 2005 12:27 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Hi Robert,

I don't remember all your long term issues with the EPG so can't honestly
tell you if they are fixed or not. If they do, please use the EPG error
reporting form so that I can get on them.

Thanks!
Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
Quote:
From: "Robert Schlabbach" <robert_s@gmx.net
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
8Zko2wYtFHA.656@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl

<#g#8fRuuFHA.3756@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl>
<132mi151mf9691jhr0g0r9hm4do7gs2uge@4ax.com>
<fE84PhTvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl>
<OtZtzCUvFHA.1252@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl>
Quote:
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 05:18:56 +0200
Lines: 157
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4952.2800
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4952.2800
Message-ID: <#xGsPRyvFHA.1560@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
NNTP-Posting-Host: p54bf06f4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de 84.191.6.244
Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:58451
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

I don't believe there ever was a problem with the MCE EPG service for the
USA/Canada. It's the service for the European countries which was never
satisfactory. But knowing that Chris is now on the job surely is hope that
the situation might finally improve (hey, it's only been 2 years since MCE
was first launched in Europe...) Now it's worth my time taking another
look
if my long-time EPG issues still persist...

Regards,«
--
Robert Schlabbach
e-mail: robert_s@gmx.net
Berlin, Germany

"Dana Cline - MVP" <dcline@scriptpro.com> wrote in message
news:OtZtzCUvFHA.1252@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
Chris,

For what it's worth, I had a good response recently on the EPG. In
Kansas
City KS, our provider Everest Cable changed some of the channel numbers
around on a Friday. I emailed zap2it.com on Saturday, using the address
provided on their web site and supplying all the information they
requested. The electronic guide was corrected as of Monday afternoon
when I got home from work.

Dana Cline - MVP

""Chris Hill [MSFT]"" <a-chill@microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:fE84PhTvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl...
Hi Folks,

I appreciate and understand your concerns with issues involving data
quality within the MCE guide. I have a regularly scheduled conference
call
with out partners to discuss data quality issues and will bring this
up
during the next call. Before I can deal with this specific issue,
there
is
specific information I need such as the Headend ID, channels, postal
code,
provider name, signal type, Etc. The headend ID can be obtained by
going
into Settings, TV, Guide, About Guide Listings. It will be marked as
ID
in
the lower 1/2 of the screen (or you can do a screen capture of that
screen
and attach it to your reply). Here is a list of the information I
need:

Postal Code:
Headend ID:
Signal Type (Terrestrial/Cable/DVB-T/Sat):
Provider ID (Sky, Telewest etc):
Country:


If possible the URL to the actual provider's website with the current
channel lineup that I can provide BDS to ensure they get accurate
information.

While I know that more people will respond please use the EPG
reporting
links as the first response. I only check these websites once a week
while
I receive the reproducible EPG quality issues on a daily basis.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.

--------------------
From: Tiny Tim
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting
Dataservices
Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2005 19:06:16 +0100
Message-ID: <132mi151mf9691jhr0g0r9hm4do7gs2uge@4ax.com
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
8Zko2wYtFHA.656@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
#g#8fRuuFHA.3756@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 3.0/32.763
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 33
Organization: Customer of PlusNet plc (http://www.plus.net)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 9d9d795a.ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net
X-Trace:



DXC=[k<J6<QWmC1oP_n1HW];Q0igd3Y`7Rb;>@`8gV4CC7I7f`WFn?WW=53?4\5R7Lfbh2CBUkc
[
PEkY72SknD3KcmG6
X-Complaints-To: abuse@plus.net
Path:



TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onl
i



ne.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!border2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp
.



ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!proxad.net!news.clara.net!wagner.news.cl
a



ra.net!nntp-peering.plus.net!ptn-nntp-feeder02.plus.net!ptn-nntp-spool02.pl
u
s.net!ptn-nntp-reader03.plus.net!not-for-mail
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:57781
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

I'd like to echo those sentiments. Sky makes several channel changes
every few months, including renumbering channels and adding new
ones.
There was a big reshuffle a couple of weeks ago. This changes are
not
reflected in MCE yet. But neither are changes made many months ago.
Digiguide manages to keep pace with the changes pretty well!

What seems odd, and frustrating is that some very niche foreign
channels are in the guide but lots and lots of regular English
speaking channels are absent or wrongly numbered.

Even if it needs negotiation to get data for new channels, how hard
can it be to at least renumber where required. Also, where the
missing
channels are simply of the +1 or +2 type, how hard would it really
be
to sort out the guide for these?

Please expedite a fix.

Regards,
Tim.

On Fri, 16 Sep 2005 18:29:23 +0100, "CJSnet"
usenet@TEETHthe-simpson.tv> wrote:

Chris, I'm not saying it's necessarily you, but somebody isn't
doing
their
job properly at all.

E4+1 on channel 145 of Telewest is still not appearing in the Guide
or
as a
channel.
The Living TV channel number changes have still not happened.

Do you appreciate that waiting two months after my service provider
starts
broadcasting a channel, before I can view or schedule recordings
from
it, is
absolutely unacceptable?





Back to top
CJSnet
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:27 pm    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

PS: Please note Telewest London is listed 5 times on the Guide Issue Form
under 5 different names, so I have submitted the report 5 times.
Back to top
CJSnet
Guest





Posted: Sat Oct 01, 2005 4:27 pm    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Having started listing errors using the online tool in July 2005, and having
started this thread on 9 September 2005, I am really frustrated and
disappointed that it is now October and still not a single of one of the
requested fixes has happened.

Why on earth is it so difficult to list popular TV channels on what is
supposed to be the wonderful media experience that is MCE?!

Again, currently reported issues are (for the fifth time):
Telewest Digital London:
New channel 'E4 +1' has been on air for 2 months but still does not appear
(Channel # 145)
Living TV has moved channel numbers
Living TV +1 has moved channel numbers

New missing channels noticed when looking at the full channel listing:
abc1
Discovery Realtime

Please also note a new channel is about to launch and MCE customers will
expect it to be in the Guide for the launch night:
'more4'

Please can you offer some explanation for what on earth is going wrong?
--
Thanks.

CJSnet

(Remove TEETH to reply by e-mail.)
Back to top
CJSnet
Guest





Posted: Sun Oct 02, 2005 12:27 am    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

And the list goes on...

1. UKTV G2+1 is missing from lineup
2. Channel 890 is for Telewest Info but the Guide Data says 'Welcome to
ntl'! NTL is a competing company to Telewest so I'm pretty sure Telewest
don't welcome you to NTL!
3. Discovery Realtime missing
4. You list 'Home & Leisure' and 'Discovery Health' but there is actually a
channel called 'Discovery Home and Health' so which is it you are showing
listings for there? Needs updating
5. UK Style+1 is listed twice at channels 266 and 290 - which is it?
6. I noticed Adult channel is shown but has no channel number associated
7. Jetix is not listed
8. ABC1 is not listed

Please advise.

(apologies for any repeated items)
--
Thanks.

CJSnet

(Remove TEETH to reply by e-mail.)
Back to top
Martin Kirk
Guest





Posted: Mon Oct 03, 2005 2:16 pm    Post subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataser Reply with quote

Surely for Sky Digital there is no regional variation beyond that of BBC and
ITV regional services, which are essentially static. All the other channel
changes are generic across the whole of the UK. Given that Sky is the largest
digital TV provider in the UK, I would have thought it would be both simpole
and a priority to track their channel changes and keep a large segment of
your customers happy.

Both Digiguide and TiVo manage t his with no problem. TiVo use Tribune Media
Services and while they do have problems with infividual programme data on
occasion, they generally have absolutely no difficulty keeping track of
channel changes/additions/deletions.

As I have said before, this does not seem to be rocket science. The MECE EPG
is becoming increasingly out of sync with Sky. I have not seen any channel
number changes for a long time. I am sure that we all appreciate Chris'
efforts, btu it would be more convincing to actually see some results.



""Chris Hill [MSFT]"" wrote:

Quote:
Hi Dan,

Thank you for the suggestion. When we started the quest for program data
providers several were contacted with our requirments. I was not involved
in that, however BDS was the partner of choice and they have been working
hard to meet our requirments. One consideration was that there are over
26,000 unique headends that we need data for on a daily basis. This is a
stagering number and BDS has done an excellent job of providing the data.
This is not to say they are perfect and don't have room to improve, but
they are doing something that many companies were not willing or able to do
at that time.

Chris Hill
Windows Media

Please do not send e-mail directly to this alias. This address is for
newsgroup purposes only.
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--------------------
From: "Coderanger" <danp@coderanger.com
Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter
Subject: Re: EPG Error Submissions ignored by MS/Broadcasting Dataservices
Date: 20 Sep 2005 13:44:46 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 9
Message-ID: <1127249086.418341.184640@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
References: <uskB$gXtFHA.3188@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl
8Zko2wYtFHA.656@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
#g#8fRuuFHA.3756@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl
132mi151mf9691jhr0g0r9hm4do7gs2uge@4ax.com
fE84PhTvFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl
NNTP-Posting-Host: 81.6.234.71
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1127249092 17367 127.0.0.1 (20 Sep 2005
20:44:52 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 20:44:52 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/0.2
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1;
.NET CLR 1.1.4322; .NET CLR 2.0.50215),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=81.6.234.71;
posting-account=8BG_fwwAAACnfTBgMuF1C25m6j0H20ew
Path:
TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGP08.phx.gbl!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-onli
ne.de!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.gigan
ews.com!postnews.google.com!g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter:58250
X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.mediacenter

I appreciate and understand your concerns with issues involving data
quality within the MCE guide.
Why don't you give the guys at DigiGuide a call, I know they supply
listings data directly now and support over 450 channels including Sky
Box Office, Front Row and all the +1's mentioned in this thread.

You can contact them at http://listings.digiguide.com/services/, I am
sure they would love to do a deal.



Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WinXPTalk.com Forum Index -> Windows XP Media Center Edition All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, ... 10, 11, 12  Next
Page 2 of 12

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Office Forums Access Forums Windows Server Exchange Server Help
New Topics Powered by phpBB