visibility question...
WinXPTalk.com Forum Index WinXPTalk.com
Forums for Windows XP users.
 
 FAQFAQ   MemberlistMemberlist     RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
 
Google
 
Web winxptalk.com
visibility question...

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WinXPTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System
Author Message
Lawless
Guest





Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:13 am    Post subject: visibility question... Reply with quote

Hi,

Want to confirm if I am doing it right or not: Rebuild an image with .slx
which has standby problem (visibility=200), somehow, using the same .slx file
and rebuild it with visibility=1000 (default) ==> during the build process, I
saw a total 13 unnecessary component being removed: Class install - pcmcia &
flash memory, Network protocol. imaging devices & multi-port serial. class
install library - Eqnclass, Spx, Dgsetup & Dgrpsetu. CoDevice Installer -
multi-port serial, Primitive: MPRUI, common control library Policy 6, DGI+
Policy XPSP1, windows XP service pack 1 resource dll, C Runtime Library.
After that, "dependencies" checked and runtime image built with no error or
warnings.

Somehow, this image does not have the standby issue I had before !! Any
idea on why ?? or which component could be causing the system not to go in
standby ? Is it O.K. to use runtime image built with visibility = 1000 ?

Best regards,
Lawless
Back to top
KM
Guest





Posted: Wed Jan 12, 2005 4:46 am    Post subject: Re: visibility question... Reply with quote

Lawless,

This is the first time I hear that Visibility setting has any affect on the list of components that are includes by
DependencyChecker.
You have Auto-Resolve Dependency option turned on, right?
And you are saying that when you only changed the TD MinVisibility option from 200 to 1000 and re-build you saw some unnecessary
component being removed?

Just a theory: if you don't have some Class Installer components in your image, some drivers were not properly install or not
install at all. This may cause the Stanby feature not working.

--
Regards,
KM, BSquare Corp.


Quote:
Hi,

Want to confirm if I am doing it right or not: Rebuild an image with .slx
which has standby problem (visibility=200), somehow, using the same .slx file
and rebuild it with visibility=1000 (default) ==> during the build process, I
saw a total 13 unnecessary component being removed: Class install - pcmcia &
flash memory, Network protocol. imaging devices & multi-port serial. class
install library - Eqnclass, Spx, Dgsetup & Dgrpsetu. CoDevice Installer -
multi-port serial, Primitive: MPRUI, common control library Policy 6, DGI+
Policy XPSP1, windows XP service pack 1 resource dll, C Runtime Library.
After that, "dependencies" checked and runtime image built with no error or
warnings.

Somehow, this image does not have the standby issue I had before !! Any
idea on why ?? or which component could be causing the system not to go in
standby ? Is it O.K. to use runtime image built with visibility = 1000 ?

Best regards,
Lawless
Back to top
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    WinXPTalk.com Forum Index -> Embedded System All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Office Forums Access Forums Windows Server Exchange Server Help
New Topics Powered by phpBB