| Author |
Message |
John
Guest
|
Posted:
Mon Oct 31, 2005 9:27 am Post subject:
NET Framework 1.1 trouble |
|
|
Usually I install .Net framework on already working target device (after
FBA, I mean), among other applications I need. A week ago I made updates to
my Component Database and noticed NET Framework 1.1 component. Of course, I
added it to my SLX and some components it depends on. And after FBA, when I
try to open Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Configuration console, I've got
'Snap-in failed to initialize' error message now. The nodes in the left pane
are displayed, but the right side is empty.
Any suggestions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Nehrhood /MSFT/
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 02, 2005 1:49 am Post subject:
Re: NET Framework 1.1 trouble |
|
|
You mention below that you added "some components it depends on." What are
these components? I just built a small runtime with the command shell, an
imported PMQ (with about 50% of those devices disabled), and the .NET
Framework 1.1 component in which the mscorcfg.msc file seems to work just
fine. I have "Auto-resolve dependencies" enabled on my build system. It
sounds as if your config is missing one of those dependencies that stems
from the .NET Framework 1.1 component. (Whether it's a direct dependency or
a branched dependency I could not tell you)
--
Nick Nehrhood
(Windows Embedded Group)
Embedded team blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/
---
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
_____________________________________
"John" <John@security-systems.ru> wrote in message
news:%23eNc3gf3FHA.1140@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | Usually I install .Net framework on already working target device (after
FBA, I mean), among other applications I need. A week ago I made updates
to my Component Database and noticed NET Framework 1.1 component. Of
course, I added it to my SLX and some components it depends on. And after
FBA, when I try to open Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Configuration
console, I've got 'Snap-in failed to initialize' error message now. The
nodes in the left pane are displayed, but the right side is empty.
Any suggestions?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John
Guest
|
Posted:
Wed Nov 02, 2005 4:31 pm Post subject:
Re: NET Framework 1.1 trouble |
|
|
I disabled "Auto-resolve dependencies" on my system, but I think that is not
a problem because I've got no unresolved dependencies from .NET Framework
1.1 component.
Really, I've got troubles with web service developed by our programmers
(service is a part of big application). The message in Event Log is
(id=1088):
Failed to execute request because the App-Domain could not be created.
Error: 0x80131040. In IE it comes as "Server Application is anavailable..."
<!-- I need to say that in XP PRO (sp1, sp2) everything works fine. I use XP
Embedded SP1 with some updates -->
I tried searching the solution, but nothing helped. I reistalled ASP NET
(aspnet_regiis -i -enable), stopped IIS services during the process, changed
userName in machine.config to SYSTEM...
Here is the only error line I found in ASPNETlog:
2005-11-02 12:34:38 Failure Getting IIS6 specific SID:
GetPrincipalSIDfailed with HRESULT80070534: 'No mapping between account
names and security IDs was done. '
I also found out, that IUSR_MACHINENAME (by the way MACHINENAME in XP PRO
becomes real _machine_ _name_, if computer name is "SERVER", then user is
called IUSR_SERVER, but in XP Emb I see MACHINENAME instead) is not a member
of any user group. Adding him to Administrators (and aspnet_regiis -i after
that) changed nothing.
Snap-in is still failed to initialize...
Interesting is that installing framework from setup package (Framework
should be disabled in RT Image for that) gives me working system with
working application. I wanted just minimize the time needed for preparing
embedded system ready for use :). |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nick Nehrhood /MSFT/
Guest
|
Posted:
Thu Nov 03, 2005 12:37 am Post subject:
Re: NET Framework 1.1 trouble |
|
|
And you have the component "Microsoft Management Console (MMC)" in your
config?
Truly you should just turn on auto check dependancies just to see if
anything what-so-ever happens to come into the runtime.
Also - have you disabled anything with the intention of reducing your
footprint which may have inadvertently broken this functionality?
--
Nick Nehrhood
(Windows Embedded Group)
Embedded team blog: http://blogs.msdn.com/embedded/
---
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
_____________________________________
"John" <John@security-systems.ru> wrote in message
news:u7VPYh53FHA.472@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
| Quote: | I disabled "Auto-resolve dependencies" on my system, but I think that is
not a problem because I've got no unresolved dependencies from .NET
Framework 1.1 component.
Really, I've got troubles with web service developed by our programmers
(service is a part of big application). The message in Event Log is
(id=1088):
Failed to execute request because the App-Domain could not be created.
Error: 0x80131040. In IE it comes as "Server Application is
anavailable..."
!-- I need to say that in XP PRO (sp1, sp2) everything works fine. I use
XP Embedded SP1 with some updates --
I tried searching the solution, but nothing helped. I reistalled ASP NET
(aspnet_regiis -i -enable), stopped IIS services during the process,
changed userName in machine.config to SYSTEM...
Here is the only error line I found in ASPNETlog:
2005-11-02 12:34:38 Failure Getting IIS6 specific SID:
GetPrincipalSIDfailed with HRESULT80070534: 'No mapping between account
names and security IDs was done. '
I also found out, that IUSR_MACHINENAME (by the way MACHINENAME in XP PRO
becomes real _machine_ _name_, if computer name is "SERVER", then user is
called IUSR_SERVER, but in XP Emb I see MACHINENAME instead) is not a
member of any user group. Adding him to Administrators (and
aspnet_regiis -i after that) changed nothing.
Snap-in is still failed to initialize...
Interesting is that installing framework from setup package (Framework
should be disabled in RT Image for that) gives me working system with
working application. I wanted just minimize the time needed for preparing
embedded system ready for use :).
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
|
|